Purpose

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether an upfront invasive strategy of TEVAR plus medical therapy reduces the occurrence of a composite endpoint of all-cause death or major aortic complications compared to an upfront conservative strategy of medical therapy with surveillance for deterioration in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.

Condition

Eligibility

Eligible Ages
Over 21 Years
Eligible Genders
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Age > 21 years 2. Stanford type B aortic dissection not involving the aorta at or proximal to the innominate artery, without rupture and/or malperfusion (renal, mesenteric, or extremity) 3. Acuity: within 48 hours - 6 weeks of index admission 4. Ability to provide written informed consent and comply with the protocol 5. Investigator believes anatomy is suitable for TEVAR

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Ongoing systemic infection 2. Pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 3 months 3. Life expectancy related to non-aortic conditions < 2 years 4. Unwilling or unable to comply with all study procedures including serial imaging follow-up 5. Known patient history of genetic aortopathy 6. Penetrating Aortic Ulcer and Intramural hematoma 7. Iatrogenic (traumatic) aortic dissection 8. Prior surgery for aortic dissection

Study Design

Phase
N/A
Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Arm Groups

ArmDescriptionAssigned Intervention
Experimental
Upfront TEVAR plus Medical Therapy
Participants randomized to upfront TEVAR will receive a commercially available device customized to their individual anatomical requirements. Stent-graft implantation will be performed either in the operating room with appropriate digital imaging equipment to allow fluoroscopic and trans-esophageal echo (TEE) guidance or the catheterization laboratory, angiographic suite (with digital angiographic equipment).
  • Procedure: TEVAR
    Thoracic endovascular aortic repair
  • Other: Guideline directed medical therapy and surveillance of dissection
    Routine clinical care with suggested antihypertensive therapy and cardiovascular risk factor reduction as per appropriate cardiovascular guidelines.
Active Comparator
Medical Therapy with surveillance for deterioration
Participants randomized to upfront Medical Therapy with Surveillance for Deterioration will be treated per routine clinical care with suggested antihypertensive therapy and cardiovascular risk factor reduction as per appropriate cardiovascular guidelines.
  • Other: Guideline directed medical therapy and surveillance of dissection
    Routine clinical care with suggested antihypertensive therapy and cardiovascular risk factor reduction as per appropriate cardiovascular guidelines.

Recruiting Locations

University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas 66160
Contact:
Joedd Biggs, MD

More Details

Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Duke University

Study Contact

Megan Roebuck, M.S.
919-316-0628
megan.roebuck@duke.edu

Detailed Description

The study will be a prospective, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial of the comparative effectiveness of an initial strategy for the treatment of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD). Patients with uTBAD and no prior history of aortic intervention will be randomized within 48 hours to 6 weeks after index admission to one of the two initial strategies. Follow-up will be ascertained via a centralized call center and ascertainment of medical records, as well as remote blood pressure monitoring. Recommendations regarding medical therapy will be made to enrolling centers and feedback on the quality of medical care given, however, all subsequent care, with the exception of aortic interventions, will be at the discretion of the responsible clinical care team. Aortic interventions will allowable only as per protocol.

Notice

Study information shown on this site is derived from ClinicalTrials.gov (a public registry operated by the National Institutes of Health). The listing of studies provided is not certain to be all studies for which you might be eligible. Furthermore, study eligibility requirements can be difficult to understand and may change over time, so it is wise to speak with your medical care provider and individual research study teams when making decisions related to participation.