Purpose

Ureteroscopy has been considered the best approach when treating renal stones smaller than 2 cm. This procedure is usually performed together with ureteral access sheaths, which helps protect the ureter mucosa and lowers intrarenal pressure. Recently, a new vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath called ClearPetra has entered US market and allows for continuous stone fragmentation and aspiration. Because there is little information on comparing this device with traditional approach (no sheath or non-vacuum-assisted sheath) in American population, we aim to compare those devices in terms of their ability to clear the kidney from kidney stones, as well as reduce infection rates postoperatively.

Conditions

Eligibility

Eligible Ages
Over 18 Years
Eligible Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Males or females over18 years of age 2. Undergoing primary flexible ureteroscopy for retrograde intrarenal surgery 3. Total stone burden between 1.0 to 2.5 cm

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Undergoing bilateral stone treatment during the same procedure 2. Patients with known genitourinary anatomical abnormalities 3. Uncorrected coagulopathy 4. Patients with urinary diversions 5. Chronic external urinary catheters 6. Women who are pregnant 7. Immunosuppressed patients 8. Non-elective procedures

Study Design

Phase
N/A
Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description
Parallel assignment
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None (Open Label)

Arm Groups

ArmDescriptionAssigned Intervention
Active Comparator
1. RIRS WITH VACUUM-ASSISTED URETERAL ACCESS SHEATH
In Arm 1, participants will undergo RIRS with ClearPetra™ vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath. Participants will undergo RIRS per standard of care.
  • Device: ClearPetra Ureteral access sheath
    Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to vacuum-assisted (ClearPetra) or traditional approach group for retrograde intrarenal surgery according to standard of care.
No Intervention
2. RIRS WITH TRADITIONAL APPROACH
In Arm 2, participants will undergo RIRS a traditional approach (no sheath or non-vacuum-assisted sheath). The treating investigator will decide whether to use a regular UAS based on their preference and/or availability. - No ureteral access sheath - Navigator™ Ureteral Access Sheath 11/13 Fr (Boston Scientific®) - Navigator™ Ureteral Access Sheath 12/14 Fr (Boston Scientific®)

Recruiting Locations

University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City 4273837, Kansas 4273857 66160
Contact:
Jane Ledesma, BS
913-588-8721
jledesma2@kumc.edu

More Details

Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
University of Kansas Medical Center

Study Contact

Jane Ledesma
19135888721
jledesma2@kumc.edu

Detailed Description

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is now considered gold-standard for treatment of renal stones smaller than 2 cm. This procedure often employs a ureteral access sheath (UAS), as it helps to reduce intrarenal pressure and protects the ureter mucosa when basketing is required. However, the challenge imposed by residual stone fragments and sepsis remains. Additionally, natural elimination of residual stone fragments may induce renal colic, hematuria an even the potential for new stone development. Recently, a new vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (VA-UAS) named ClearPetra™ provides concomitant stone fragmentation and aspiration. The new ClearPetra™ vacuum assisted ureteral access sheath allows simultaneous fragmentation and extraction of stones. It is a disposable access sheath equipped with a continuous flow aspiration mechanism. Previous studies have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of ClearPetra™ in RIRS Comprehensive comparative investigations between ClearPetra™ and traditional UAS in RIRS are lacking in American population. We aim to compare the outcomes of using VA-UAS (ClearPetra™) or traditional approach (no sheath or non-vacuum-assisted sheath) to treat patients with stone burden between 1.0 - 2.5 cm.

Notice

Study information shown on this site is derived from ClinicalTrials.gov (a public registry operated by the National Institutes of Health). The listing of studies provided is not certain to be all studies for which you might be eligible. Furthermore, study eligibility requirements can be difficult to understand and may change over time, so it is wise to speak with your medical care provider and individual research study teams when making decisions related to participation.